If Ludwig von Mises is the creator of tailwind

Posted on by


I ask Chatgpt to describe a hypothetical scenarios.

It splits out a interest read.

Here’s what it responds:

(https://chatgpt.com/s/t_69606c90f33481919e15061d66de83b9)

Fun thought experiment. Let’s take Mises seriously as Mises, not as a growth hacker, and see how he’d reason if he somehow created Tailwind and faced revenue dropping because AI reduces website visits.

I’ll structure this in praxeological terms rather than modern SaaS jargon.



1. How Mises would diagnose the problem

Mises starts from:

Human action is purposeful behavior under uncertainty

So he would not say:

  • “Traffic is down”
  • “AI killed SEO”
  • “Marketing is broken”

He would say:

Consumers have changed their plans.

Key insight:

  • People are no longer choosing to visit Tailwind’s website as part of their plan to build UIs.
  • They are choosing AI-mediated paths (ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, etc.) instead.

This is not a crisis, but a revealed preference.

From a Misesian view:

  • Falling revenue = a market signal
  • It means Tailwind’s current means no longer best serve consumer ends



2. What Mises would not do ❌

Very important.

Mises would reject:

  • ❌ Complaining about AI “stealing attention”
  • ❌ Trying to force traffic back via dark patterns
  • ❌ Lobbying for regulation against AI
  • ❌ Chasing vanity metrics (pageviews, impressions)

Why?

Because:

You cannot argue with the market.
You can only adapt your plan.



3. The real problem (Mises framing)

Tailwind’s original model:

Value delivery = documentation + examples + branding → premium upsell

But now:

AI compresses knowledge

  • Docs are summarized instantly
  • Examples are generated on demand
  • Discovery happens inside AI, not websites

So the problem is:

Tailwind’s value was partially informational, and information has been commoditized.

This is classic Mises:

  • When a means becomes abundant, its marginal value falls



4. Mises’ solution: shift the locus of value

Mises would ask:

What cannot be commoditized by AI?

Answer:

  • Judgment
  • Coordination
  • Standards
  • Authority
  • Interoperability
  • Time-saving certainty

So Tailwind must move from:

“We provide knowledge”

to:

“We reduce uncertainty for builders.”



5. Concrete Misesian strategies for Tailwind



A. Sell certainty, not CSS utilities

Instead of:

  • “Here’s how Tailwind works”

Offer:

  • Certified design systems
  • Canonical component contracts
  • Official UI patterns with guarantees

Example:

“This layout is guaranteed to be accessible, responsive, and future-compatible.”

That is uncertainty reduction, which AI cannot guarantee.



B. Become infrastructure, not content

Mises deeply understood capital structure.

He would push Tailwind to become:

  • A complementary capital good inside production processes

Examples:

  • Tailwind Compiler as a Service
  • Official Tailwind Lint + Policy Engine
  • Version-locked enterprise builds

Once embedded:

  • Demand becomes derived demand
  • Revenue stabilizes



C. Price discrimination (but ethically)

Mises supported market segmentation.

Tailwind would:

  • Keep core free (necessary for ecosystem)

  • Charge for:

    • Team coordination tools
    • Audit trails
    • Design governance
    • Long-term support guarantees

This aligns prices with heterogeneous plans of users.



D. Embrace AI instead of fighting it

Mises would never fight a productivity improvement.

He would:

  • Make Tailwind the default CSS ontology for AI

  • Provide:

    • Official AI schemas
    • Component grammars
    • “AI-safe” Tailwind patterns

So that when AI generates UI:

It generates Tailwind-first output

That restores derived demand without traffic.



6. Why this works (praxeology logic)

Revenue recovers because:

  • Tailwind re-aligns its means with new ends
  • AI changes how users act, not that they act
  • Entrepreneurs who anticipate these changes earn profit

Mises would say:

Profit is the reward for correctly anticipating future consumer valuations.



7. Final Mises-style summary

If Mises ran Tailwind, he would conclude:

“The problem is not AI.
The problem is that Tailwind was priced as information rather than as capital.”

And his solution would be:

Move up the structure of production.
Sell certainty, coordination, and embedded usefulness.
Let AI spread the doctrine—then monetize the discipline.

If you want, I can:

  • Map this to a real Tailwind pricing redesign
  • Compare Mises vs Schumpeter vs modern SaaS thinking
  • Or rewrite this as a memo Mises would send to the Tailwind team

Just say the word.



Source link